Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 138 - United States v. Smithson

United States v. Smithson’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 138 · 1995

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

31 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably United States v. Asibor (1997), United States v. Jobe (1996)

31 federal appellate ·

290199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 18 U.S.C. § 152

Relies on Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc. v. Maxway Corp. · United States v. Chaney · United States v. West · United States v. Mackay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) was a correct statement of the law, (2) was not substantially covered in the charge as a whole, and (3) concerned an important point in the trial such that the failure to instruct the jury on the issue seriously impaired the defendant's ability to present a given defense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We afford the district court substantial latitude in formulating the jury instructions and review a district court's refusal to give a requested instruction for abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he loss to the estate resulting from the concealment was, for all practical purposes, zero.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.