Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 294 - Bh Ch Je v. McDonald T Murphy R W T

Bh Ch Je v. McDonald T Murphy R W T’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2025

1 district · 4 state decisions

501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Nixon · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Brown v. Board of Education · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Now, three years [after approval of the consent decree], all sides agree that the DCFS has failed to meet its obligations under the consent decree. The DCFS has consistently failed to deliver plans for effecting real change and has missed the deadlines set out in the consent decree." ( B.H., 49 F.3d at 295 .)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The ACLU, which commenced this suit in the name of the neglected children of Illinois, believes that the Illinois legislature has acted unwisely—that it has been too stingy with money and has given DCFS the wrong set of priorities. The ACLU and the DCFS do not necessarily agree on the right way to handle the needs of children, but they coincide in thinking that the legislative solution is the wrong one. So they assented to moving the subject from the legislature's province to their own. The legislature of Illinois was not consulted about, and did not accede to, this allocation of power—and, even if the legislature had consented, the judge should not have been an accomplice to the transfer of a political question to a judicial tribunal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The decision to close the conferences aroused the ire of [Public Guardian] Patrick Murphy, who had earlier sought unsuccessfully to intervene.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.