Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 378 - United States v. Rice

United States v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 378 · 1995

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
July 2010
most recently cited

32 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably United States v. Darden (1995), United States v. Brown (1998)

32 federal appellate ·

270199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. Young · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Scherl v. Fisher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[wjhere there are two permissible views of the evidence, the [district court’s] choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.