Feingold v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.3d 437 · 1995
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2021
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 1007 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344
Relies on United States v. Matlock · Department of Revenue of Montana v. Ranch · Fondel v. Ford Motor Co. · O'Neill Group v. Continental Airlines Corp. · United States v. Lewis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is an element of the offense, and it also defined the phrase. The instructions given on the elements of bank fraud and the definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.