United States v. Hare’s Empirical Analysis
49 F.3d 447 · 1995
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably United States v. Edelmann (2006), United States v. Davis (2009)
29 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on United States v. Mezzanatto · United States v. Stroud · United States v. Jorgensen · United States v. Lombardi · United States v. Grant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]tatements voluntarily offered either before any plea negotiation has begun or after a plea agreement has been reached cannot be considered statements made 'in the course of plea discussions' within the meaning of the exclusionary rules.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he plain language of [Rule] 410 excludes 'only those statements which are made in the course of plea discussions.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“prohibits anyone from knowingly engaging 'in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property that is of a value greater than $10,000 and is derived from specified unlawful activity.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.