Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 51 - Pino v. Ryan

Pino v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 51 · 1995

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Walker v. Thompson (2002), Kropelnicki v. Siegel (2002)

15 federal appellate · 5 district ·

390199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Neitzke v. Williams · Denton v. Hernandez · Calder v. Job · Tilton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the claim is 'based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.' " Nance v. Kelly, 912 F.2d 605 , 606 (2d Cir.1990) (per curiam) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 , 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 1833, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989)). A claim is based on an "indisputably meritless legal theory”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “we have frequently urged district judges to use caution in deciding whether to dismiss [pro se] complaints [pursuant to Sec. 1915(d) ] prior to service upon defendants and the filing of a motion or answer ... caution need not lead to paralysis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “plaintiff has alleged no facts indicating a continuous or ongoing violation of his constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.