Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 63 - United States v. Reyes

United States v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 63 · 1995

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Quintieri (2002), United States v. Zagari (1997)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · United States v. Mitchell · Mesarosh v. United States · Legg v. United Markets International, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “New evidence that is merely impeaching will not ordinarily justify a new trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[a] motion for a new trial based on the ground of newly discovered evidence may be made only before or within two years after final judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he two-year time period for a Rule 33 motion begins to run when the appellate court issues its mandate of affirmance. In the absence of a stay of mandate granted by the appellate court, the date of the denial of a petition for writ of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court is irrelevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.