Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.3d 658 - United States v. Stenzel

United States v. Stenzel’s Empirical Analysis

49 F.3d 658 · 1995

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
4
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Moore v. Reynolds (1998), William Koch v. United States Trust Company of New York

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 7 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Johnson v. Zerbst · Edwards v. Arizona · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “); U.S. v. Davis, 993 F.2d 62, 64 (5th Cir.1993) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel includes the right to present closing argument. Herring v. New York, 422 U.S. 853, 865 , 95 S.Ct. 2550 , 45 L.Ed.2d 593 (1975). This guarantee, like other constitutional rights, may be waived. A waiver must be knowing and intentional, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938), overruled on other grounds, Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), but a defendant may not fail to object to perceived error and thereby invite a court to commit error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Any justice, judge or magistrate of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.