Compton v. Jarvis

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 21, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-10-21

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Sammy W. Compton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Compton v. Jarvis, No. CA-02-751-7 (W.D.Va. July 22, 2002). We deny a certificate of appeal-ability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). *414 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.