Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

49 F. App'x 451

Shelton v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 30, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-10-30

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Wessel v. Glendening

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-10-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Tyrone Shelton appeals the magistrate judge’s and district court’s orders denying relief in part on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s and district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge and district court. See Shelton v. Angelone, No. CA-99-750-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2000; Mar. 22, 2001; filed Mar. 27, 2002 and entered Mar. 28, 2002). In addition, we note that the district court’s opinion on Shelton’s ADA claim is consistent with our recent decision in Wessel v. Glendening, 306 F.3d 203 (4th Cir.2002) (No. 00-6634). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *452legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

¶3 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

/49/fappx/451 · .json · Public domain