Tenaud v. Dodrill

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-10-31

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-10-31

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Hugo Tenaud appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition, construing the petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it as successive. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tenaud v. Dodrill, No. CA-02-49-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.