Fester v. Farmer Bros.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2022
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins · O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. · Sanchez v. Denver Public Schools
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'statements made by an attorney concerning a matter within the employment may be admissible against the party retaining the attorney.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Parham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.