Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 F.R.D. 142 - Centrowitz v. Texaco, Inc.

Centrowitz v. Texaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 1981
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail Road

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are ever mindful that a jury’s verdict should not be disturbed except in unusually persuasive circumstances where gross injustice ensues, that the Court should not substitute its own estimate of damages for that announced by the jury; that a jury’s verdict should not be disturbed because it was not as generous as the facts in the case warranted. . . . Where, however, as here, the Court’s conscience is shocked by the jury’s grossly inadequate award, ... it becomes the bounden duty of the Court to interfere lest a grave injustice result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.