49 Ill. 2d 98 - The People v. Burris’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 139 Ill. 2d 264 - People v. Enis (1990), 128 Ill. 2d 540 - People v. Turner (1989)
86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Davis v. Mississippi · 42 Ill. 2d 91 - The People v. Nicholls · Morales v. New York · 23 Ill. 2d 280 - The People v. Burage
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[Defendant] did not testify that the subsequent written statement was in any way the product of any previous interrogation or that he felt compelled to give a written statement because of anything he may have previously said to the detective. It would appear that if the written statement had in any way been influenced by any previous interrogation or conduct, the defendant would have given some testimony from which such an inference could have been drawn. We conclude that the written statement was properly admitted into evidence.” ( 49 Ill. 2d 98, 104 , 273 N.E.2d 605, 609-10 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The court instructs the jury that if the jury believes from the evidence beyond aU reasonable doubt, that the defendant, immediately after the commission of the crime with which he stands charged, fled and remained away until taken into custody, such flight is a proper circumstance to be considered in determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘The extent of cross-examination with respect to an appropriate subject of inquiry rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. It is only in the case of a clear abuse of such discretion resulting in manifest prejudice to the defendant that a court of review will interfere.’ ” ( 66 Ill. 2d 478, 487 , 363 N.E.2d 801, 805 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.