Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 INDAPP 166 - Johnson v. Spencer

Johnson v. Spencer’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2010

5 federal appellate · 2 district · 17 state decisions

7019121920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co. · Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. Sidener · Colter v. Frese · Supreme Tribe of Ben Hur v. Hall · Clark v. Huey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘When the work is done on the building for the contractor of the materials furnished to him to be used in that particular building, and they are so used, the laborer or materialman is entitled to a lien upon filing'the proper notice at the proper time, subject to his power to waive the lien by contract, or to estop himself from asserting it by acts which would create an estoppel in any other case; but simply furnishing the goods or doing the work on the order and credit of the contract or without' any present intention of creating a lien is not a waiver nor an estoppel.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““An estoppel in pais arises when by the fault of one person another has been induced, ignorantly or innocently, to change his position for the worse. Its existence is determined by the acts, knowledge and conduct of both parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.