Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 INDAPP 334 - Cole v. Searfoss

Cole v. Searfoss’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 1998 · most notably 115 Ind. App. 383 - Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. Williams (1945), 147 Ind. App. 142 - Rouch v. Bisig (1970)

27 state decisions

230191219201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. Croly · Nickey v. Steuder · Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. Butler · Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. Marschke · Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Tindall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a child is sui juris it is held to be capable of exercising some care and discretion, but it is not necessarily held to the same degree of care required of a person of mature years. The care which the law exacts of such a child is only such as it was capable of exercising in view of its age, knowledge and experience, and it is guilty of negligence only when it fails to exercise the care so exacted. In most cases the amount of care required of such a child is a question of fact for the jury. Indianapolis, etc., R. Co. v. Wilson (1893), 134 Ind. 95 ; Keller v. Gashill (1894), 9 Ind. App. 670 ; Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Sears (1894), 11 Ind. App. 654 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.