Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 KAN 415 - In re O'Connell

In re O'Connell’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a general finding that the petitioner had money and property in his possession and under his control which he unjustly refused to apply to the payment of his debts... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the kind of property, or state the amount of money the petitioner had in his possession ... [and to] describe the property under his control.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.