State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on State v. Ward · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Timley · State v. Hall · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The essence of the crime is forcibly taking property when a person is present. The term ‘from the 'person or the presence’ of the victim describes the proximity of the properly and the individual. It does so with phraseology that overlaps. Taking property from the presence of the victim (who need not be the owner of whatever the perpetrator seizes) describes an area in the general vicinity of the victim. Taking property from the person of the victim refers to the immediate environs of the body such as a pocket, a purse, or tire hands. Thus, a taking ‘from the person’ is actually encompassed within a taking ‘from the presence’ of the victim. The robbery and aggravated robbery statutes would criminalize the same range of conduct even if the phrase ‘the person’ had been omitted from the definitions of those crimes.” 46 Kan. App. 2d at 950 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Cato-Perry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.