Bardon Trimount, Inc. v. Guyott’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (§ 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9607 (§ 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980)
Relies on 17 Cal. 4th 599 - Santisas v. Goodin · Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen Corp. · Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp. · Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency Fund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is plain spoken and '[successful] party' is to be understood in the ordinary or popular sense, and given commonsense meaning[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a plaintiff does not 'prevail' without obtaining relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.