Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 MONT 354 - State v. Groom

State v. Groom’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2025

20 state decisions

50191419201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tighe · State v. Landry · Dupont v. Mcadow · State ex rel. Root v. McHatton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not every deviation, however slight, from the strict letter of the law in drawing or returning a jury will furnish ground for challenge to the panel. The statute in terms requires that the departure must be a material one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “defeat the constitutional guaranty of an impartial jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.