Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 N.C. App. 58 - Watson v. Watson

49 N.C. App. 58 - Watson v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2011

21 state decisions

1001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shaffer v. Heitner · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Williams v. State of North Carolina · Sherrer v. Sherrer · Johnson v. Muelberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The objecting party has the burden of satisfying the trial court that he would be prejudiced by the granting or denial of a motion to amend. The exercise of the court's discretion is not reviewable absent a clear showing of abuse thereof.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.