Hampton v. Priddy’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1968
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Scott v. Helmick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““14-8-16. Contests — District court jurisdiction — Preservation of returns — Recount — Action perpetually barred. — A. The district court shall entertain contests for any municipal office or on any question placed on the ballot and the procedure shall be the same as provided by law for contests of county officers, including the recount of ballots. No such suit or action shall be maintained unless it is instituted within thirty [30] days after the issuance by the municipal clerk of a certificate or notification of the results of the election. “B. If the district court orders a recount, the district court shall determine if any fraudulent, illegal or void ballots have been counted. The district court may order such ballots to be thrown out and enter judgment accordingly in the recount proceedings. “C. The ballots only shall be destroyed either: (1) thirty [30] days after the issuance of the certificate of election; or (2) if there is a contest of election, after the court has rendered judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Romenesko v. Barber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.