Aranbula v. Banner Min. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
2 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2007 · most notably Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc. (2001), Lyon v. Catron County Commissioners (1969)
2 district · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. Francks · 124 Cal. App. 378 - Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission · Carroll v. Industrial Commission · Webb v. New Mexico Pub. Co. · Stevenson v. Lee Moor Contracting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the Webb case, supra, while it is stated that accidental injuries may arise even without the usually attending factors of narrow limits of time for the beginning and completion of the injury, or without unusual, or extraordinary, conditions of employment not common to others, and, although in the Stevenson case we said that an accident may also include ‘an injury which is itself an accident’ * * * citing with approval Carroll v. Industrial Comm., 69 Colo. 473 , 195 P. 1097, 1098 , 19 A.L.R. 107 , yet in neither case did we say that there must not be an accident, as distinguished from common occupational, or industrial, sickness or disease.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We do not decide whether appellant would have been entitled to compensation if his injury had occurred while performing the usual and ordinary labors incident to his employment, and not under the extraordinary conditions found by the court; that is, whether the injury and not the cause of it must be unintentional and unexpected to constitute an injury by accident. The facts of this case do not require it, and we express no opinion on the question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““We believe that the great weight of authority favors the view that silicosis acquired over a period of years and without the element of excessive exposure and sudden and unexpected occurrence of injury or illness is an occupational disease and not an injury by accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.