Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Ohio App. 2d 112 - State v. Burgun

49 Ohio App. 2d 112 - State v. Burgun’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Pack v. City of Cleveland (1982), 104 Ohio App. 3d 241 - State v. Mays (1995)

39 state decisions

15019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Hamling v. United States · Miller v. California · Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The formal charge whether by indictment, information, or complaint under Crim.R. 3, must contain the constituent elements of a criminal offense. While all of the specific facts relied upon to sustain a charge need not be recited, the elements of the crime must be stated.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The complaint is a written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged. It shall also state the numerical designation of the applicable statute or ordinance. It shall be made upon oath before any person authorized by law to administer oaths.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “nature and cause of the accusation against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.