49 Ohio App. 2d 268 - State v. Haag’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably 117 Ohio App. 3d 92 - State v. Dyer (1996), 102 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Bayer (1995)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Carnley v. Cochran · Brookhart v. Janis · State v. Tymcio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(B) Counsel in petty offenses. Where a defendant charged with a petty offense is unable to obtain counsel, the court may assign counsel to represent him. When a defendant charged with a petty offense is unable to obtain counsel, no sentence of confinement may be imposed upon him, unless after being fully advised by the court, he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives assignment of counsel. (C) Waiver of counsel. Waiver of counsel shall be in open court and the advice and waiver shall be recorded as provided in Rule 22. In addition, in serious offense cases the waiver shall be in writing.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““[W]hen a defendant (1) is convicted of a petty offense; (2) an imprisonment penalty is imposed; and (3) he is not represented by an attorney at his trial, the imprisonment portion of the sentence will be vacated, unless a record is made (in accordance with Crim.R. 22 and Crim.R. 44) which affirmatively demonstrates either that the defendant would have been able to obtain counsel, or he knowingly waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.” Haag, 49 Ohio App.2d at 271 , 3 O.O.3d at 303 , 360 N.E.2d at 759 . See, also, State v. Whipple (Apr. 30, 1997), Summit App. No. 17997, unreported, 1997 WL 242665 .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Henley · State v. Domers“all waivers of counsel required by Rule 44(B) shall be recorded * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.