49 Ohio App. 2d 7 - State v. Snowden’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

51 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “* * * too distant in time or too removed in method or type has no permissible probative value.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Miley, Unpublished Decision (9-8-2006) · State v. Ayers, Unpublished Decision (10-17-2006)

2. ““In any criminal case in which the defendant’s motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident on his part, or the defendant’s scheme, plan, or system in doing an act is material, any acts of the defendant which tend to show his motive or intent, the absence of mistake or accident on his part, or the defendant’s scheme, plan, or system in doing the act in question may be proved, whether they are contemporaneous with or prior or subsequent thereto, notwithstanding that such proof may show or tend to show the commission of another crime by the defendant.” R.C. 2945.59.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Greer · 81 Ohio App. 3d 706 - State v. Davis

3. “carries the potential for the most virulent kind of prejudice for the accused,”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Sieng, Unpublished Decision (12-31-2003) · 66 Ohio App. 3d 37 - State v. Lewis