Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 OHIOST2D 135 - State v. Osborne

State v. Osborne’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably State v. Maurer (1984), State v. Getsy (1998)

2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

24019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estes v. Texas · Rideau v. Louisiana · State v. Bayless

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he statute prohibits a conviction of both [offenses], not the submission to the jury of both.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.