Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 OHIOST3D 182 - State v. Jamison

State v. Jamison’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

810
cited by 810 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

801 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 810 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Lott (1990), State v. Mills (1992)

801 state decisions

31901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California · Williams v. Florida · Britt v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 810 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Other acts forming a unique, identifiable plan of criminal activity are admissible to establish identity under Evid.R. 404(B).”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an accused cannot be convicted of one crime by proving he committed other crimes or is a bad person.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “While `other acts' evidence may not be used to prove criminal propensity, such evidence may be admissible `if (1) there is substantial proof that the alleged other acts were committed by the defendant, and (2) the evidence tends to prove notice, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.