49 Okla. Crim. 265 - Tobin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““* * * The question of admitting testimony that would be proper in chief to be used in rebuttal is within the sound discretion of the trial judge, and, unless there has been an abuse of that discretion, the admission of the testimony will not be sufficient to warrant a reversal of the case.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 70 Okla. Crim. 443 - Sweet v. State

2. ““The law does not require that the names of witnesses used in rebuttal shall be indorsed on an indictment or information.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 70 Okla. Crim. 443 - Sweet v. State