49 Okla. Crim. 369 - Morrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boyd v. United States · Weeks v. United States · Gouled v. United States · Counselman v. Hitchcock · Ex parte Irvine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“); Morrison v. State, 49 Okl.Cr. 369, 374-75 , 294 P. 825, 827 (1931) (''That in order to secure immunity under section 27 of article 2, the incriminatory evidence given by a witness in order to support a plea in bar must have been given under an agreement with the prosecuting attorney and approved by the court; or the witness must have claimed the privilege of silence which was denied by the court and the witness compelled by the court to testify. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barthelme
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.