Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 PACOMMW 54 - Adamson v. Commonwealth

Adamson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Klemow v. Time Incorporated · Oas v. Commonwealth · Buckley & Co. v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The standards for sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer are quite strict. A demurrer admits every well-pleaded material fact set forth in the pleadings to which it is addressed as well as all inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, but not conclusions of law.... In order to sustain the demurrer, it is essential that the plaintiff’s compliant indicate on its face that his claim cannot be sustained, and the law will not permit recovery. ... If there is any doubt, this should be resolved in favor of overruling the demurrer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.