¶1(dissenting). Prom the fact that the plaintiff refused to permit the physician who examined her after her encounter with the defendant to testify as to whether he found any injuries, it should be conclusively presumed that she suffered no injury to her person. And the fact that she was a bootlegger —a common outlaw — shows that she had no character, and no standing or reputation in the community that could be injured by her arrest. I think the order appealed from ought to be affirmed and the action dismissed at plaintiff’s cost.
49 S.D. 39
Gamble v. Keyes
Decided December 9, 1925
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1925-12-09
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1925-12-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1999
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →