Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 SD 429 - State v. Murray

State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1978

4 state decisions

20192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ogden · Plunkett v. State · State v. Stimpson · State v. Whitesell · State v. Yokum

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the materiality of the evidence sought to be elicited is not apparent from the question itself, and there was no offer of proof, the exclusion of the evidence does not constitute reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.