Johnson v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1961
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Opinion of the Judges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is nothing in the title to chapter 266 to indicate or give notice that the law contains anything that changes, or attempts to change or affect, the powers or duties of the Attorney General, and for that reason the provisions of subdivision (1) are invalid, and it is not necessary to give consideration to the second proposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“attorney and assistant to the rural credit board”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“head of the legal department of this state”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.