Maye v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 790 So. 2d 179 - Milano v. State · Strong v. State · 725 So. 2d 220 - Higgins v. State · Robinson v. State · 667 So. 2d 590 - Manuel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether error lies in the [giving] or refusal of various instructions, the instructions actually given must be read as a whole. When so read, if the instructions fairly announce the law of the case and create no injustice, no reversible error will be found. There is no error if all instructions taken as a whole fairly, but not necessarily perfectly, announce the applicable rules of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Thornton v. State · Allen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.