Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 SO3D 1190 - Boudreaux v. Kemp

Boudreaux v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Clark · 553 So. 2d 61 - Satterfield v. Winston Industries, Inc. · Cooper v. Watts · 349 So. 2d 1117 - Cockrell v. World's Finest Chocolate Co., Inc. · Dorcal, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “The standard of review in the case of an order setting aside, or refusing to set aside, a default judgment proceeds on the basis that the trial judge has great discretion, and his judgment will not be disturbed unless he has clearly [exceeded] such discretion.” Roberts v. Wettlin, 431 So.2d 524, 526 (Ala. 1983). However, “[w]hen the grant or denial [of a request for relief from a judgment] turns on the validity of the judgment, discretion has no place for operation. If the judgment is void, it is to be set aside; if it is valid, it must stand.” Smith v. Clark, 468 So.2d 138, 141 (Ala. 1985).’””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “' "[f]ailure to exercise due diligence in perfecting personal service of process precluded notice by publication”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.