¶1 The order denying appellant’s motion for return of property is affirmed for reasons other than those given by the trial court. Appellant’s motion was facially insufficient. See Almeda v. State, 959 So.2d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
¶2 Affirmed.
49 So. 3d 321
Johnson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 24, 2010
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-11-24
Relies on Almeda v. State
Decided 2010-11-24