Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 SO3D 372 - State v. Strother

State v. Strother’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

50 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Ewing v. California · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · Graham v. Florida · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “For her part, Fay Strother claimed that it was Effie LeBleu, not defendant, who used a belt and fly swatter on the baby. Mrs. Strother also testified that she saw Ms. LeBleu throw the baby on the couch, causing the child to fall off and hit her head on the floor, giving rise to knots on her forehead. Although Mrs. Strother testified that she never saw defendant hit the baby, when asked whether she would be shocked to hear that he hit the baby with a fly swatter, she stated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Defendant's parents testified in his defense. Both Jimmy and Fay Strother saw defendant, Effie LeBleu, and the two children when they were buying diapers on the morning of February 2, 2007. Although defendant and Ms. LeBleu stated that the baby was bruised at that time, defendant's parents denied seeing any bruises. Jimmy Strother further testified that Ms. LeBleu improperly pulled the baby out of her carriage by grasping only one arm,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.