49 So. 3d 418 - Moreno v. Entergy Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 504 So. 2d 833 - Meloy v. Conoco, Inc. · 279 F. Supp. 122 - Kantlehner v. United States · 939 So. 2d 650 - Teche Financial Services, Inc. v. State, Department of Public Safety, Office of Motor Vehicles · Toups v. Koch Gateway Pipeline, Inc. · 915 So. 2d 811 - Toups v. Koch Gateway Pipeline, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the cross-claims of Entergy . . . were premature. No fault has been allocated to any party in the case, and no damages from Moreno's action have been assessed against Entergy. No cause of action for indemnity has been incurred by Entergy at this phase in the matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appellate courts cannot supply an exception of prematurity on its [sic] own motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“exception of no cause of action on the basis of prematurity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.