49 So. 3d 488 - State v. Marinello’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Ring v. Arizona · Smith v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We also reject the defendant’s assertion that, if his complaints cannot be reviewed due to lack of a contemporaneous objection, they should be considered as a pattern of presenting the defendant as a bad person. The combined effect of assignments of error, none of which warrant reversal on its own, does not deprive a defendant of his right to a constitutionally fair trial. State v. Rochon, 98-717, p. 14 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/10/99), 733 So.2d 624, 633 . The Supreme Court has noted that the “cumulative error” doctrine has lost favor in the Louisiana courts. State v. Draughn, 05-1825, p. 70 (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583, 629 . Significantly, the Supreme Court in State v. Manning, 03-1982 (La.10/19/04), 885 So.2d 1044 , quoted with approval Mullen v. Blackburn, 808 F.2d 1143, 1147 (5th Cir.1987), where the federal Fifth Circuit rejected the | ^cumulative error doctrine by noting that “twenty times zero equals zero.” State v. Ayo, 08-468, pp. 29-30 (La.App. 5 Cir. 3/24/09) , 7 So.3d 85, 104 , writ denied, 09-1026 (La.3/5/10), 28 So.3d 1006 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.