Abernathy v. Adoue’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently April 1972
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Curlee v. Walker · Hooper v. Lottman · Green v. Gerner · Johnson v. Poteet · Couch v. Southern Methodist University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But the filing of these pleas was justified by the allegations of the in-terveners that the general plan or scheme of South End Land Company in platting and dedicating and selling Westmoreland addition was to create a highly restricted residential district and that the removal of the restrictions from appellant’s lots would injure their property. While the interveners were not given a specific right, by the deeds under which.they held, to contest appellant’s petition, yet, under general principles of equity, they had the right to do so by showing that the cancellation of these restrictions would violate the general plan or scheme under which they purchased their property, resulting in damage to their property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Changed conditions in a neighborhood brought about by agencies outside of the parties themselves will terminate a building restriction limiting or restricting property in use for residential purposes only. Abernathy v. Adoue (Tex.Civ. App.) 49 S.W.2d 476 .” [ 54 S.W.2d at p. 243 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hunter v. Pillers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.