Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

49 Tex. Crim. 534

95 S.W 506

Wisdom v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 22, 1906

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1906-03-22

<p>Passing Forged Instrument—Variance Between Indictment and Proof—Surplusage.</p> <p>In a prosecution for passing a forged instrument, where the indictment alleged that the defendant passed the alleged instrument to a certain corporation naming it, it was necessary to prove this allegation, and the same could not be treated as surplusage.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1906-03-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1961

5 state decisions

201906191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BROOKS, Judge.

¶1 Conviction for passing a forged instrument, the punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. The indictment contains two counts: one charging forgery, and the other knowingly passing as true a forged instrument. The first count was quashed. The only insistence of appellant that we deem necessary to review is the error assigned that the court erred in holding that the *535 State was not required to prove that the City National Bank of Decatur was a corporation; the second count of the indictment having alleged that appellant did wilfully, knowingly and fraudulently pass as true to the City National Bank of Decatur, Texas, a corporation, a false and forged instrument in writing. Whether necessary or not to allege that the bank was incorporated, we think, however, it was necessary to prove it after making the allegation. This cannot be justly treated as surplusage. We therefore hold that it was necessary to prove the incorporation of said bank. Usher v. State, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 921; Lucas v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 48; Webb v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 534. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

¶2 Reversed and remanded.

/49/texcrim/534 · .json · Public domain