Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 U.S. 274 - Jonathan Reed v. The Proprietors of Locks and Canals on Merrimac River

Jonathan Reed v. The Proprietors of Locks and Canals on Merrimac River’s Empirical Analysis

49 U.S. 274 · 1850

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2015 · most notably Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc. (1995), Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. (2015)

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

10018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Solomon Etting v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Fowler v. Shearer · Parker v. Smith · Proprietors of the Kennebeck Purchase v. Springer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is true, that it was the duty of the court to give a construction to the deed in question, so far as the intention of the parties could be elicited therefrom.... But after all this is done, it is still a question of fact to be discovered from evidence dehors the deed ... for the jury to decide, whether the land in controversy is included therein, or, in other words, was intended by the parties so to be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.