49 Va. App. 155 - Brooks v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
September 2010
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Crawford v. Washington · Chambers v. Mississippi · Illinois v. Allen · Michel v. State of Louisiana Poret
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In sum, we hold a defendant's failure timely to notify the Commonwealth of his desire to confront the forensic analyst at trial constitutes a waiver of that right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Belvin · Coleman v. People“`the trial court never had occasion to address the proper order of proof.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Cypress v. Com. · Magruder v. Com.“Code § 19.2-187.1 provides the mechanism by which he may reject the request and have the analyst summoned to appear at trial at the cost of the Commonwealth in order to be subject to cross-examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Magruder v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.