Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Va. App. 749 - Jasper v. Commonwealth

49 Va. App. 749 - Jasper v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Horton v. Allen · State v. Dedman · 7 Cal. 4th 1144 - People v. Arreola · United States v. Cervantes-Flores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a “procedural guarantee” that also “applies to state prosecutions,” Michels v. Commonwealth, 47 Va.App. 461, 466 , 624 S.E.2d 675, 678 (2006), provides that, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him,” U.S. Const, amend. VI.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the certificates are not by their nature accusatory and do not describe any criminal wrongdoing of appellant. Rather they are a neutral repository of information that reflects the objective results of a search of public records.... [They] certif[y] that a search has been conducted and particular records do not exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.