49 Wash. 2d 605 - Kennett v. Levine’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1985
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Barnard v. Board of Education · Fawcett v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This is an ancillary proceeding in which the appellant seeks a permanent writ of supersedeas pending the appeal. The sole issue presented is whether this court, in the exercise of its discretion, should require that the litigants' status quo be maintained until the appeal can be heard upon its merits before this court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In aid of its appellate jurisdiction, this court has inherent power to grant all writs it deems necessary and proper to preserve the fruits of appeal for an appellant in the event such appeal should be successful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“all other writs necessary and proper to complete exercise of its appellate and revisory jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.