Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Wash. App. 171 - Crites v. Koch

49 Wash. App. 171 - Crites v. Koch’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 88 Wash. App. 306 - Lilly v. Lynch (1997), 60 Wash. App. 534 - State v. Souza (1991)

25 state decisions

11019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 100 Wash. 2d 853 - Chaplin v. Sanders · Ricks v. Grubbs · 94 Wash. 2d 479 - Petersen v. Port of Seattle · 13 Wash. 2d 75 - Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co. · 93 Wash. 2d 766 - Peeples v. Port of Bellingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]ermissive use is not hostile and does not commence the running of the prescriptive period. Use that is permissive in its inception cannot ripen into a prescriptive right unless the claimant has made a distinct and positive assertion of a right hostile to the owner.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the failure of the trial court to make an express finding on a material fact requires that the fact be deemed to have been found against the party having the burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “differed fundamentally in scope and substance” from the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.