Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 WASHAPP 371 - State v. Adamski

State v. Adamski’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 103 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Campbell · 105 Wash. 2d 632 - State v. Terrovona · Roscoe v. Arizona · 108 Wash. 2d 515 - State v. Bebb · 93 Wash. 2d 80 - State Ex Rel. Nugent v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(ii) the State's evidence is presently unavailable, the prosecution has exercised due diligence, and there are reasonable grounds to believe that it will be available within a reasonable time; or (iii) required in the due administration of justice and the alleged juvenile offender will not be substantially prejudiced in the presentation of his or her defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A subpoena may be served by any suitable person over 18 years of age, by exhibiting and reading it to the witness, or by giving him a copy thereof, or by leaving such copy at the place of his abode. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.