Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 49 Wash. App. 432 - State v. Johnson

49 Wash. App. 432 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2003

7 state decisions

40198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Manson v. Brathwaite · Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · 37 Cal. 3d 351 - People v. McDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) where the identification of the defendant is the principal issue at trial; (2) the defendant presents an alibi defense; and (3) there is little or no other evidence linking the defendant to the crime.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In other words, there must be serious contradictions in the eyewitness testimony, as well as a proper `fit' between those contradictions and the proposed expert testimony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “of [State v.] Chapple, [ 135 Ariz. 281 , 660 P.2d 1208, 1217-18 (1983),] which included numerous photographic lineups, multiple exposures of the witnesses to the defendant's photograph, and a close resemblance between the defendant and another suspect. See Chapple, 660 P.2d at 1217-18 ; see also [People v.] McDonald, [ 37 Cal. 3d 351 ,] 690 P.2d [709,] at 711-15 [ 208 Cal. Rptr. 236 (1984)]. Therefore, we conclude that this is simply one of the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.