49 Wash. App. 546 - State v. McCullough’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 47 U.S.C. § 409
Relies on Katz v. United States · Kastigar v. United States · Steinberger v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR TENTH JUD. · 100 Wash. 2d 52 - State v. Runions · In re Jaime T.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“subjected to criminal penalty... on account of any transaction, matter, or fact concerning which he has been ordered to testify[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.